H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 10-2

Victoria Azarenka holds a 10–2 lead over Angelique Kerber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 8–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Berlin Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
10 – 2
12 main draw meetings
Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #16 6-3 7-5 Angelique Kerber #27 Match data Jun 18, 2021* R16 Berlin Open WTA 500 Grass
Victoria Azarenka #15 7-5 6-2 Angelique Kerber #26 Match data Mar 28, 2021* R32 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #67 6-4 4-6 6-1 Angelique Kerber #5 Match data Apr 6, 2019* SF Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #8 6-2 7-5 Angelique Kerber #3 Match data Apr 2, 2016* SF Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Angelique Kerber #6 6-3 7-5 Victoria Azarenka #16 Match data Jan 28, 2016* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #22 6-3 6-1 Angelique Kerber #10 Match data Jan 9, 2016* F Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #20 7-5 2-6 6-4 Angelique Kerber #11 Match data Sep 6, 2015* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #48 6-0 6-3 Angelique Kerber #11 Match data Feb 25, 2015* R32 Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-7(11) 7-6(2) 6-4 Angelique Kerber #5 Match data Oct 22, 2012 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Angelique Kerber #6 (w/o) Victoria Azarenka #1 Match data Sep 29, 2012* QF Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 7-5 Angelique Kerber #7 Match data Aug 3, 2012* QF London Olympics Olympics Grass
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 6-3 Angelique Kerber #19 Match data Mar 14, 2012* SF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,055 477 277 63.3% 3 0 0 7 4 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Angelique Kerber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,516 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,549 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,503 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,673 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2012 60–21 74.1% #5 1,978 0 2
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,944 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2014 43–22 66.2% #10 1,894 0 3
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,924 0 7
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2016 60–19 75.9% #1 2,033 2 10
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,770 2 10
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 2018 46–17 73.0% #2 1,934 3 12
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 2019 29–20 59.2% #20 1,806 3 12
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,769 3 12
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,936 3 13
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,880 3 14
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2024 9–11 45.0% #205 1,830 3 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Angelique Kerber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2010 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 31 14 45 68.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 35 17 52 67.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 29 14 43 67.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 28 17 45 62.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 44 12 56 78.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2018 28 12 40 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2019 19 14 33 57.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2020 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2021 14 9 23 60.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2022 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 296 176 472 62.7% 90 65 155 58.1% 85 34 119 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 672/754 of Angelique Kerber's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Angelique Kerber
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2007 15/16 0.5 3.7 62.3% 62.0% 42.2% 43.7% 48.4% 54.8% 42.3%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2008 17/21 0.9 3.0 66.6% 56.4% 40.9% 45.9% 45.4% 51.0% 46.3%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2009 9/9 1.0 4.2 66.0% 58.4% 39.8% 42.7% 56.5% 51.7% 44.4%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2010 38/42 1.7 3.4 62.9% 63.0% 43.8% 49.4% 51.5% 55.9% 46.2%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2011 35/37 1.5 3.7 62.1% 62.7% 44.6% 54.1% 51.4% 55.9% 47.4%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2012 69/81 1.8 2.8 64.7% 65.8% 50.1% 56.8% 51.8% 60.0% 46.3%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2013 65/67 2.3 3.0 62.2% 65.8% 48.3% 54.4% 51.2% 59.4% 47.1%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2014 62/65 1.7 3.0 65.9% 63.7% 45.4% 57.8% 48.6% 57.3% 47.2%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2015 53/73 1.3 2.2 70.2% 64.1% 50.9% 52.5% 50.1% 60.0% 46.2%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2016 62/81 1.5 2.6 64.6% 65.4% 50.6% 55.3% 51.0% 60.3% 47.5%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% 2017 51/51 1.4 3.5 65.8% 64.5% 48.3% 50.4% 42.5% 59.0% 43.1%
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% 2018 56/63 1.5 3.2 63.7% 65.7% 49.3% 54.9% 51.0% 59.7% 48.1%
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% 2019 45/49 1.4 3.2 62.3% 64.1% 49.7% 56.1% 51.1% 58.4% 46.2%
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% 2020 13/13 1.4 3.3 67.6% 61.8% 47.8% 60.6% 57.3% 57.0% 42.9%
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% 2021 44/44 1.2 3.4 65.8% 63.0% 46.7% 55.9% 51.8% 57.4% 46.3%
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% 2022 22/22 1.3 3.3 66.2% 62.0% 49.1% 64.1% 46.7% 57.5% 45.1%
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 16/20 1.4 3.3 69.4% 60.3% 43.5% 58.8% 57.0% 55.0% 41.9%
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 672/756 1.5 3.1 64.9% 63.9% 47.7% 54.5% 50.3% 58.2% 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Angelique Kerber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) — +1.30 2006 1516 107.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.26
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.25 2007 1549 124.6 +0.02 -1.44 0.935 48.4% -29 — +104 34.4% -0.87 1–1 0–1 — -0.88
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.88 2008 1504 112.7 -2.69 +0.78 0.944 48.5% +37 -41 +104 37.8% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.05
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.87 2009 1513 113.2 -1.90 +0.77 0.918 48.2% +14 -33 — 38.1% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.11
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) — -3.63 2010 1668 127.6 +0.01 +1.81 1.048 51.1% -38 -116 +2 55.8% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 6–0 (100%) — +1.05
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) — -1.19 2011 1674 134.3 +0.19 +2.26 1.075 51.7% +34 -185 — 51.7% +0.20 3–12 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.30
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.19 2012 1978 159.7 +4.77 +3.63 1.156 53.1% -43 -216 -93 65.7% +1.17 20–3 (87%) 8–8 (50%) — -5.25
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — -3.58 2013 1944 154.5 +3.64 +3.42 1.160 53.2% +8 -94 -90 64.3% +1.08 11–11 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — +2.00
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.93 2014 1894 152.3 +1.64 +4.02 1.107 52.2% +8 -104 +54 62.8% +0.86 13–9 (59%) 12–6 (67%) — +1.84
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.48 -0.07 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2015 1925 151.7 +2.11 +5.08 1.156 52.9% -42 -27 +57 66.1% +1.10 15–11 (58%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.09
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.47 2016 2033 161.3 +4.59 +4.69 1.196 53.6% +9 -126 -3 71.2% +1.42 17–6 (74%) 10–2 (83%) — -2.44
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.62 2017 1771 141.8 +2.16 +0.76 1.052 50.7% +40 +66 +270 55.2% +0.35 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.30
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -1.12 2018 1934 162.5 +3.42 +5.45 1.194 53.8% -31 -15 +180 69.2% +1.29 12–9 (57%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.53
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.48 2019 1806 145.9 +1.58 +3.10 1.110 52.1% -9 +93 +300 59.6% +0.61 6–11 (35%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.82
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.63 2020 1769 128.3 -0.58 -0.32 0.999 50.1% +43 — — 53.6% +0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +1.28
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.56 2021 1937 147.2 +1.85 +3.37 1.088 51.7% -71 -89 +351 58.2% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.34
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.43 2022 1880 133.0 +1.28 +1.93 1.061 51.3% -34 +12 +356 54.9% +0.43 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.39
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +225 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1830 133.9 -0.86 +0.60 0.931 48.8% -1 +62 +281 46.7% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.68
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 2055 154.9 +2.19 +3.14 1.105 52.1% -7 -70 +130 60.6% +0.76 134–105 (56%) 93–66 (58%) 104.2 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.