H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 4-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–1 lead over Irina-Camelia Begu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2016 Rome third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Irina-Camelia Begu
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #35 6-3 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #6 Match data
May 15, 2015* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #29 6-4 5-7 6-1 Irina-Camelia Begu #31 Match data
Oct 13, 2012* Linz WTA 500 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-2 6-1 Irina-Camelia Begu #57 Match data
Sep 29, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-1 6-3 Irina-Camelia Begu #38 Match data
Apr 10, 2011* Marbella WTA 250 F Clay Victoria Azarenka #6 6-3 6-2 Irina-Camelia Begu #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Irina-Camelia Begu #204 #22 1,925 1,886 249 234 51.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Irina-Camelia Begu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,493 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2010 0–1 0.0% #202 1,485 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2011 16–11 59.3% #40 1,657 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2012 22–18 55.0% #52 1,729 0 1
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2013 10–17 37.0% #131 1,559 0 1
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2014 14–15 48.3% #41 1,617 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2015 30–20 60.0% #31 1,711 0 2
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2016 25–18 58.1% #29 1,711 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2017 20–22 47.6% #43 1,667 0 4
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2018 19–24 44.2% #67 1,601 0 4
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2019 11–16 40.7% #102 1,555 0 4
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2020 5–8 38.5% #78 1,710 0 4
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2021 17–15 53.1% #62 1,736 0 4
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2022 25–15 62.5% #34 1,834 0 5
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2023 17–14 54.8% #75 1,781 0 5
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2024 10–7 58.8% #79 1,807 0 5
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2025 7–9 43.8% #144 1,760 0 6
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2026 1–3 25.0% #204 1,726 0 6