H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 4-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-2 Iveta Benesova #46 Match data
Oct 22, 2011* Luxembourg WTA 250 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-3 6-2 Iveta Benesova #53 Match data
Jun 24, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Victoria Azarenka #5 6-0 6-3 Iveta Benesova #53 Match data
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #14 6-2 6-3 Iveta Benesova #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —