H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Julia Goerges H2H: 5-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 5–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2013 Rome third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-0 Julia Goerges #25 Match data
Oct 14, 2012* Linz WTA 500 F Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #19 Match data
Mar 9, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-3 6-1 Julia Goerges #15 Match data
Oct 22, 2011* Luxembourg WTA 250 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-3 6-3 Julia Goerges #21 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Victoria Azarenka #5 6-4 6-2 Julia Goerges #27 Match data
Apr 22, 2011* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Julia Goerges #32 4-6 0-0 (ret.) Victoria Azarenka #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Victoria Azarenka Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0
2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2
2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2
2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2
2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2
2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2
2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2
2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4
2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6
2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7
2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7
2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 — — — — — — —
2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 — — — — — — —
2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 — — — — — — —
2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —