H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Kim Clijsters H2H: 3-4

Kim Clijsters holds a 4–3 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 Australian Open semifinal 6-4 1-6 6-3.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 29, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-4 1-6 6-3 Kim Clijsters #14 Match data
Mar 26, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #8 6-3 6-3 Kim Clijsters #2 Match data
Jan 15, 2011* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-3 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #10 Match data
Oct 25, 2010 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Kim Clijsters #4 6-4 5-7 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #10 Match data
Jun 19, 2010* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Victoria Azarenka #15 7-6(6) 6-4 Kim Clijsters #9 Match data
Mar 26, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #16 6-4 6-0 Victoria Azarenka #7 Match data
Aug 20, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kim Clijsters #5 7-5 4-6 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Kim Clijsters
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41