H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 5-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 5–0 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2013 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-4.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-4 Monica Niculescu #49 Match data
Oct 23, 2011* Luxembourg WTA 250 F Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-2 Monica Niculescu #34 Match data
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Victoria Azarenka #11 6-0 5-7 6-1 Monica Niculescu #93 Match data
Oct 17, 2008* Zurich WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #18 6-0 6-0 Monica Niculescu #66 Match data
May 15, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #19 6-3 6-2 Monica Niculescu #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21