H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-2

Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2011 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Victoria Azarenka #5 6-2 6-2 Nadia Petrova #37 Match data
Jun 30, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Victoria Azarenka #8 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 Nadia Petrova #10 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Stuttgart WTA 500 SF Hard Nadia Petrova #18 6-4 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #17 Match data
Jun 28, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Nadia Petrova #18 7-6(11) 7-6(4) Victoria Azarenka #16 Match data
Sep 28, 2007* Luxembourg WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #38 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —