H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Simona Halep H2H: 2-3

Simona Halep holds a 3–2 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Simona Halep leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2019 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Simona Halep
ROU Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 7, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Simona Halep #7 6-3 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #40 Match data
Jul 11, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Simona Halep #2 7-6(3) 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #683 Match data
Sep 10, 2015* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Simona Halep #2 6-3 4-6 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #20 Match data
Oct 12, 2012* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-1 Simona Halep #46 Match data
Feb 17, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-3 6-1 Simona Halep #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Simona Halep #873 #1 8,290 2,111 446 197 69.4% 2 10 1 2 9 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Simona Halep
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2010 7–9 43.8% #84 1,552 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2011 16–22 42.1% #47 1,592 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2012 23–23 50.0% #47 1,699 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2013 50–17 74.6% #11 2,004 0 6
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2014 46–18 71.9% #3 1,969 0 8
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2015 49–16 75.4% #2 1,929 0 11
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2016 41–14 74.5% #4 1,997 0 14
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2017 44–18 71.0% #1 1,973 0 15
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2018 45–12 78.9% #1 2,005 1 18
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2019 39–16 70.9% #4 1,938 2 19
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2020 23–3 88.5% #2 2,056 2 22
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2021 24–13 64.9% #20 1,949 2 22
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2022 39–13 75.0% #10 1,986 2 24
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2024 0–2 0.0% #873 1,913 2 24
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2025 0–1 0.0% #873 1,887 2 24
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —