H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 4-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2018 Mallorca third round 6-7(4) 6-3 7-5.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
SUI Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2018* Mallorca WTA 250 R32 Grass Victoria Azarenka #85 6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 Stefanie Voegele #93 Match data
Jan 4, 2014* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 6-4 6-7(7) 6-1 Stefanie Voegele #50 Match data
Jan 12, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-1 Stefanie Voegele #140 Match data
Jan 21, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #7 6-4 6-0 Stefanie Voegele #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,712 100 175 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Stefanie Voegele
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,517 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,496 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,665 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,550 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,513 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2016 10–15 40.0% #114 1,517 0 0
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,591 0 0
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2019 6–16 27.3% #119 1,582 0 0
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,597 0 0
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,536 0 0
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,499 0 0
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21