H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 7-4

Victoria Azarenka holds a 7–4 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 5–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-4 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 4
11 main-draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #16 6-4 2-6 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #40 Match data Jun 1, 2021* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Victoria Azarenka #14 6-2 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #39 Match data Mar 3, 2021* R32 Qatar Open WTA 500 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #8 6-3 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #19 Match data Apr 3, 2016* F Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 7-5 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #75 Match data Jan 25, 2013* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 7-6(5) 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #28 Match data May 9, 2012* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 Match data Mar 11, 2012* R32 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 6-2 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data May 8, 2009* SF Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #10 6-3 2-6 7-5 Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 Match data Apr 4, 2009* SF Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-2 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #17 Match data Jun 2, 2008* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 1-6 7-5 6-0 Victoria Azarenka #27 Match data Mar 27, 2008* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-2 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #41 Match data Sep 4, 2007* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,098 594 323 64.8% 2 2 0 8 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,743 0 2
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2004 57–20 74.0% #5 2,031 1 5
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,871 1 5
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,043 1 8
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,998 1 9
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2008 41–21 66.1% #8 1,928 1 9
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,988 2 12
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,885 2 13
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,825 2 13
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,851 2 14
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,843 2 15
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 2016 46–21 68.7% #9 1,926 2 17
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,829 2 17
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 2018 11–13 45.8% #106 1,756 2 18
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,787 2 18
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,797 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Svetlana Kuznetsova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 10 4 14 71.4% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2004 40 14 54 74.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2005 11 9 20 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 38 11 49 77.6% 19 6 25 76.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 31 16 47 66.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 23 12 35 65.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 20 10 30 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 20 13 33 60.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 15 12 27 55.6% 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2015 15 13 28 53.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 34 15 49 69.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2017 17 11 28 60.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 7 5 12 58.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 9 6 15 60.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 378 207 585 64.6% 160 79 239 66.9% 49 30 79 62.0% 7 7 14 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 679/882 of Svetlana Kuznetsova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Svetlana Kuznetsova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2003 9/38 3.8 3.0 58.1% 68.2% 52.0% 64.1% 47.7% 61.2% 45.0%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2004 15/77 5.6 2.2 56.1% 69.1% 53.6% 46.7% 54.8% 62.1% 46.7%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2005 21/46 4.6 3.3 54.9% 70.1% 49.9% 57.7% 49.7% 60.7% 48.2%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2006 66/81 3.6 2.4 60.9% 66.8% 51.5% 58.6% 49.7% 60.7% 45.8%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2007 68/71 3.9 2.2 64.6% 67.5% 48.9% 60.8% 47.0% 60.9% 44.2%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2008 55/62 3.7 2.7 59.2% 68.3% 48.2% 49.2% 47.3% 60.0% 46.9%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2009 53/57 3.8 2.8 61.8% 67.8% 51.2% 57.2% 47.5% 61.4% 45.3%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2010 38/42 3.6 3.9 60.8% 69.9% 44.6% 54.0% 42.7% 60.0% 44.5%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2011 49/50 2.3 2.6 64.0% 63.5% 48.3% 50.6% 49.4% 57.8% 47.3%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2012 22/25 3.6 2.2 62.6% 62.8% 48.5% 44.1% 52.1% 57.5% 46.2%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2013 45/47 3.6 2.7 60.9% 64.4% 46.6% 48.5% 47.4% 57.4% 44.5%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% 2014 42/45 2.9 2.6 62.3% 65.6% 48.6% 51.4% 45.9% 59.0% 45.7%
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% 2015 30/45 3.0 3.5 65.2% 65.1% 52.8% 49.9% 46.5% 61.0% 41.5%
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% 2016 48/67 3.5 2.9 64.6% 65.9% 44.5% 52.7% 49.4% 58.1% 45.0%
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% 2017 46/49 2.7 3.6 67.1% 63.7% 49.2% 54.9% 52.7% 58.9% 46.2%
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% 2018 17/24 2.1 5.1 68.6% 60.5% 38.3% 56.5% 49.4% 53.4% 41.7%
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% 2019 27/27 2.3 2.5 67.0% 64.4% 49.4% 55.1% 44.6% 59.0% 43.9%
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% 2020 14/15 3.1 2.6 66.2% 64.9% 45.0% 54.0% 55.7% 58.0% 43.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 14/14 2.4 3.1 62.3% 61.3% 41.9% 56.3% 53.0% 54.0% 41.1%
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 679/917 3.4 2.8 62.7% 66.1% 48.4% 53.9% 48.4% 59.4% 45.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Svetlana Kuznetsova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 2001 1520 107.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.20 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2002 1744 121.2 — — — — -72 -31 — 59.1% +0.33 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 111.8 +0.76
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 2003 1820 144.4 +3.33 +1.48 1.157 53.1% -66 -110 -93 55.4% +0.58 5–2 (71%) 6–7 (46%) 102.4 -2.01
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2004 2031 163.4 +5.05 +2.22 1.230 54.2% -28 -160 -233 68.5% +1.26 16–8 (67%) 13–7 (65%) 109.0 -2.09
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2005 1872 147.9 +4.37 +2.97 1.228 54.4% -43 +83 +24 60.6% +0.94 9–8 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 96.1 +0.12
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2006 2043 167.5 +5.36 +2.70 1.166 53.2% +5 +9 -127 68.0% +1.45 18–5 (78%) 14–6 (70%) 110.0 -2.64
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2007 1999 160.7 +5.24 +2.13 1.130 52.6% -13 +130 -21 67.3% +1.16 14–7 (67%) 9–8 (53%) 101.1 +2.11
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2008 1929 163.8 +5.05 +3.51 1.174 53.2% +25 +134 +5 63.3% +0.95 9–8 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.11
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2009 1988 158.7 +5.86 +2.71 1.175 53.2% -19 +185 -126 66.4% +1.18 15–9 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 99.0 -1.17
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2010 1886 147.2 +4.05 +1.31 1.114 52.0% +32 +162 -41 55.9% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 3–6 (33%) 94.4 +1.44
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2011 1805 143.9 +1.84 +3.01 1.121 52.5% +38 +165 +37 59.5% +0.78 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 92.2 +1.49
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2012 1777 144.7 +1.94 +2.27 1.088 51.9% +43 +160 — 57.1% +0.82 1–4 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 92.1 -2.07
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2013 1826 146.2 +2.31 +1.13 1.043 50.8% +7 +96 — 57.8% +0.39 10–5 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 107.8 -0.29
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 2014 1851 143.7 +2.93 +2.59 1.115 52.2% -47 +87 — 60.0% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -1.59
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 2015 1843 140.8 +2.63 +0.95 1.064 51.1% -25 +86 -72 55.6% +0.51 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 101.6 -0.59
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 2016 1926 153.4 +2.42 +2.62 1.075 51.4% -2 +50 -129 60.5% +0.77 22–9 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 104.6 -0.88
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 2017 1830 142.1 +2.37 +2.49 1.124 52.4% -11 +139 +52 62.6% +0.81 9–8 (53%) 12–2 (86%) 102.3 +1.99
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 2018 1756 126.6 -1.70 -0.48 0.895 47.7% +48 +88 +52 45.6% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 97.5 -0.59
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 2019 1788 136.6 +2.21 +1.61 1.071 51.1% +61 -52 — 50.0% -0.08 5–5 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 100.6 -0.53
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 2020 1797 138.9 +1.05 +0.87 1.039 50.9% +54 -63 — 48.5% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 -0.82
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1726 127.8 -0.59 -0.05 0.894 47.7% +83 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 0–1 — +0.11
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 2099 158.3 +3.46 +2.20 1.112 52.2% -3 +61 -45 60.7% +0.80 192–127 (60%) 129–102 (56%) 102.9 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.