H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 2-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2008 Montreal fourth round 7-6(4) 2-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 7-6(4) 2-0 (ret.) Virginie Razzano #27 Match data
May 3, 2007* Estoril WTA 250 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #68 7-6(14) 7-5 Virginie Razzano #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —