H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Yafan Wang H2H: 1-1
Victoria Azarenka and Yafan Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2024 US Open third round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2024* | Washington | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Victoria Azarenka | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |