H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 2-1 (incl. walkovers)

Victoria Azarenka vs Zarina Diyas: 2–0 excluding walkovers; 2–1 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2019 Monterrey Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 1
3 main-draw results
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #67 6-3 6-2 Zarina Diyas #107 Match data Apr 5, 2019* R16 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #15 6-3 6-2 Zarina Diyas #87 Match data Mar 12, 2016* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Zarina Diyas #34 (w/o) Victoria Azarenka #25 Match data Jun 18, 2015* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 — — — — — — —
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.69 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.