H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 1-1
Viktorija Golubic and Anna-Lena Friedsam are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on clay, while Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2021 Parma third round 6-4 6-7(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2022 | Tallinn | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| May 20, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-2 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2016* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Viktorija Golubic | 6-3 7-5 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |