H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 0-1
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2017 Shenzhen third round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2017* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Viktorija Golubic | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |