Viktorija Golubic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 6, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 31, 2025 | H2H |
| Arantxa Rus | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Martina Trevisan H2H: 1-0
Viktorija Golubic holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Viktorija Golubic won the 2017 Bastad first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | 6-4 6-3 | Martina Trevisan | Match data | Jul 27, 2017* | R32 | Bastad | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #56 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,829 | 118 | 144 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martina Trevisan | #325 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,764 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #56 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #43 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2021 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2022 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2023 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2023 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2024 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 71 | 88 | 159 | 44.7% | 22 | 33 | 55 | 40.0% | 25 | 23 | 48 | 52.1% | — | 25 | 47 | 72 | 34.7% | 26 | 32 | 58 | 44.8% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 247/262 of Viktorija Golubic's and 136/137 of Martina Trevisan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 55.2% | 73.4% | 46.9% | 58.3% | 47.2% | 61.7% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 54.9% | 33.1% | 37.1% | 55.8% | 47.0% | 54.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 28/29 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 67.8% | 58.2% | 50.1% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 55.6% | 46.5% | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 71.2% | 54.3% | 35.0% | 36.5% | 30.0% | 48.2% | 37.7% |
| 24 | 2017 | 26/26 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 66.0% | 57.1% | 45.1% | 48.9% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 43.8% | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 70.4% | 50.5% | 41.5% | 49.1% | 75.0% | 47.6% | 40.5% |
| 25 | 2018 | 13/13 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 62.6% | 59.3% | 39.1% | 50.7% | 41.1% | 51.7% | 43.9% | 2019 | 5/5 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 70.2% | 50.5% | 40.6% | 49.1% | 79.4% | 47.8% | 46.0% |
| 26 | 2019 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 65.4% | 54.2% | 41.8% | 55.5% | 61.5% | 50.1% | 47.0% | 2020 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.0% | 53.9% | 44.5% | 52.7% | 54.5% | 51.0% | 46.9% |
| 27 | 2020 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 58.6% | 61.8% | 35.2% | 49.4% | 28.9% | 50.4% | 39.6% | 2021 | 19/19 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 65.8% | 56.3% | 40.4% | 52.5% | 54.8% | 50.8% | 39.1% |
| 28 | 2021 | 34/36 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 70.3% | 61.2% | 45.0% | 54.1% | 46.5% | 56.5% | 46.2% | 2022 | 33/34 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 66.3% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 49.3% | 53.1% | 53.2% | 46.9% |
| 29 | 2022 | 36/37 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 67.9% | 56.8% | 42.8% | 48.0% | 51.8% | 52.4% | 44.4% | 2023 | 40/40 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 63.7% | 58.1% | 46.6% | 46.4% | 47.9% | 53.8% | 44.3% |
| 30 | 2023 | 16/16 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 66.9% | 59.0% | 42.3% | 49.6% | 41.4% | 53.8% | 39.8% | 2024 | 27/27 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.2% | 58.7% | 41.6% | 54.2% | 39.5% | 53.0% | 40.4% |
| 31 | 2024 | 23/25 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 70.3% | 56.5% | 44.4% | 43.8% | 52.2% | 52.7% | 43.6% | 2025 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 66.7% | 47.1% | 47.1% | 37.5% | 28.6% | 47.1% | 39.3% |
| 32 | 2025 | 15/24 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 68.8% | 58.6% | 44.1% | 45.7% | 49.0% | 54.3% | 41.1% | 2026 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 58.3% | 75.0% | 52.9% | 50.7% |
| 33 | 2026 | 24/24 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 68.5% | 58.6% | 46.9% | 52.5% | 52.1% | 54.9% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 247/262 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 67.5% | 58.1% | 44.3% | 49.8% | 49.4% | 53.6% | 44.6% | — | 136/137 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 65.9% | 57.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 50.1% | 52.5% | 43.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1506 | 100.5 | +0.18 | -2.72 | 1.003 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1516 | 104.8 | +0.79 | -1.20 | 1.032 | 51.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1484 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1677 | 125.7 | -0.61 | +2.42 | 1.046 | 50.8% | -58 | -11 | -26 | 56.1% | +0.50 | 7–5 (58%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.5 | -0.96 | 2017 | 1514 | 102.3 | -0.97 | -0.26 | 0.728 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1628 | 111.6 | -2.61 | +0.22 | 0.929 | 48.3% | -1 | -75 | — | 39.7% | -0.40 | 7–9 (44%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.2 | -0.51 | 2018 | 1506 | 105.2 | -3.70 | -0.66 | 0.772 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1578 | 108.9 | -3.22 | -1.05 | 0.909 | 47.7% | +18 | -36 | — | 33.3% | -0.88 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.6 | +0.92 | 2019 | 1488 | 107.8 | -2.05 | +1.06 | 0.882 | 47.1% | — | +68 | — | 27.3% | -1.36 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1651 | 110.5 | -5.01 | +1.79 | 0.941 | 48.5% | +14 | -169 | +1 | 46.8% | -0.42 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.7 | +0.39 | 2020 | 1585 | 114.3 | -1.53 | +3.00 | 0.957 | 49.2% | — | +81 | — | 50.0% | -0.58 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.46 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1593 | 112.9 | -1.93 | -1.00 | 0.798 | 44.8% | +16 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.19 | 2021 | 1592 | 112.8 | -4.04 | -2.30 | 0.795 | 45.5% | -123 | +75 | — | 23.8% | -1.45 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.44 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1739 | 137.0 | -0.30 | +2.74 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -47 | -136 | +50 | 54.8% | +0.27 | 6–8 (43%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.8 | -0.76 | 2022 | 1694 | 124.5 | -2.59 | +3.01 | 1.004 | 50.3% | -183 | +134 | — | 52.1% | +0.11 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.5 | +0.59 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1720 | 131.4 | -2.91 | +1.24 | 0.932 | 48.4% | +18 | -133 | +30 | 47.7% | -0.42 | 6–10 (38%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.1 | -0.60 | 2023 | 1725 | 138.7 | -1.58 | +0.90 | 0.959 | 49.2% | -50 | +34 | — | 48.8% | -0.16 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.68 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1647 | 111.3 | -2.48 | -1.86 | 0.862 | 46.9% | +28 | — | +120 | 35.3% | -1.27 | 0–2 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.06 | 2024 | 1603 | 114.6 | -3.10 | -1.85 | 0.859 | 46.8% | -60 | +125 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.3 | +0.46 |
| 31 | 2024 | 1761 | 124.5 | -2.53 | +0.72 | 0.922 | 48.2% | +35 | -253 | -30 | 42.1% | -0.79 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.6 | -1.14 | 2025 | 1485 | 97.5 | -1.75 | -1.22 | 0.743 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1790 | 129.7 | -1.72 | -1.14 | 0.899 | 47.9% | +26 | -241 | — | 44.4% | -0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.5 | -1.24 | 2026 | 1536 | 99.8 | -2.21 | +1.31 | 1.076 | 51.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 |
| 33 | 2026 | 1774 | 134.0 | -1.72 | +2.11 | 1.014 | 50.3% | -31 | -90 | +68 | 49.1% | +0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–5 (17%) | 98.7 | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1829 | 129.1 | -2.17 | +1.02 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -1 | -106 | +36 | 46.3% | -0.27 | 51–66 (44%) | 34–46 (43%) | 90.8 | -1.25 | — | 1764 | 123.1 | -2.51 | +0.46 | 0.916 | 48.2% | -94 | +92 | — | 40.4% | -0.62 | 17–22 (44%) | 11–12 (48%) | 99.5 | +0.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Martina Trevisan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 9, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 2023 | H2H |