H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 1-1
Viktorija Golubic and Rebecca Marino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on grass, while Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2024 Nottingham third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2024* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Rebecca Marino | 6-1 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2023* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 6-4 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |