H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-2
Rebecca Peterson holds a 2–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2021 Chicago 1 fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2021* | Chicago 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| May 2, 2019* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rebecca Peterson | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |