H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Viktoriya Tomova vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 0-1
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 1–0 lead over Viktoriya Tomova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2024 Budapest third round 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-2 6-2 | Viktoriya Tomova | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2024* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Viktoriya Tomova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Tomova | #207 | #46 | 1,235 | 1,760 | 54 | 106 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktoriya Tomova | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #90 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #53 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #131 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |