H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Ksenia Pervak holds a 1–0 lead over Vitalia Diatchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2011 Linz Open round of 32 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ksenia Pervak | 6-4 6-1 | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data | Oct 13, 2011* | R32 | Linz Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #460 | #71 | 791 | 1,626 | 13 | 47 | 21.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,702 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #179 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2011 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 21 | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 8 | 31 | 39 | 20.5% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | 40 | 44 | 84 | 47.6% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 60/60 of Vitalia Diatchenko's and 108/116 of Ksenia Pervak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2009 | 7/7 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 54.5% | 56.3% | 32.0% | 41.5% | 46.6% | 45.1% | 42.2% | 2009 | 7/8 | 0.7 | 5.1 | 63.2% | 58.1% | 43.6% | 57.0% | 48.4% | 53.4% | 41.5% |
| 19 | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.4% | 58.1% | 39.1% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 29.4% | 2010 | 16/16 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 72.5% | 57.9% | 37.8% | 48.6% | 44.8% | 53.1% | 44.9% |
| 20 | 2011 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 6.8 | 56.7% | 52.7% | 44.0% | 49.8% | 33.8% | 49.0% | 44.3% | 2011 | 36/40 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 65.0% | 59.6% | 45.6% | 42.3% | 47.4% | 54.7% | 46.2% |
| 21 | 2012 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 56.9% | 62.3% | 52.3% | 84.4% | 50.0% | 58.0% | 35.0% | 2012 | 33/36 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 64.0% | 59.8% | 43.8% | 48.2% | 53.6% | 54.1% | 42.7% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10/10 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 65.5% | 57.3% | 37.5% | 37.2% | 43.2% | 50.2% | 44.9% |
| 23 | 2014 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 65.0% | 65.2% | 53.1% | 28.1% | 49.1% | 61.1% | 48.8% | 2014 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 6.8 | 59.7% | 60.9% | 48.5% | 45.7% | 67.1% | 56.1% | 39.4% |
| 24 | 2015 | 10/10 | 1.2 | 5.7 | 66.3% | 57.2% | 44.3% | 48.7% | 36.8% | 51.6% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 9.0 | 55.4% | 50.7% | 29.1% | 51.3% | 87.9% | 40.9% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 73.8% | 47.9% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 33.3% | 47.7% | 32.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 64.1% | 38.8% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 53.3% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 4/4 | 0.3 | 8.8 | 61.6% | 60.7% | 33.1% | 44.6% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 5/5 | 1.8 | 7.2 | 60.6% | 54.4% | 39.7% | 51.2% | 44.5% | 48.8% | 37.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 7/7 | 2.0 | 7.9 | 57.3% | 56.8% | 33.9% | 42.7% | 45.5% | 47.0% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 5.6 | 57.2% | 61.3% | 29.6% | 29.2% | 28.3% | 47.5% | 31.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 54.2% | 56.4% | 45.5% | 44.4% | 75.0% | 51.4% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 60/60 | 1.5 | 6.7 | 59.3% | 57.6% | 38.7% | 45.8% | 44.1% | 49.6% | 39.2% | — | 108/116 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 65.4% | 59.2% | 43.2% | 45.7% | 49.7% | 53.9% | 44.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1477 | 98.9 | -4.57 | -1.57 | 0.769 | 43.5% | +20 | +71 | — | 28.6% | -2.07 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.35 | 2009 | 1516 | 105.5 | -0.12 | +0.57 | 0.891 | 47.4% | +19 | — | — | 43.8% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.22 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1462 | 95.7 | -2.17 | -4.65 | 0.588 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 | 2010 | 1541 | 116.0 | -2.10 | +0.93 | 0.958 | 49.0% | +14 | -11 | — | 48.6% | -0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–0 | — | +0.79 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1441 | 104.1 | -3.48 | -0.74 | 0.870 | 46.6% | +28 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.56 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 | 2011 | 1669 | 118.5 | -0.14 | +1.89 | 1.020 | 50.3% | -10 | -138 | -7 | 56.2% | +0.40 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.0 | +2.50 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1451 | 99.9 | +0.24 | -2.13 | 0.832 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | 2012 | 1588 | 125.2 | -1.50 | -1.17 | 0.930 | 48.4% | +34 | -30 | — | 45.9% | -0.45 | 4–6 (40%) | 8–4 (67%) | 102.1 | -0.15 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1595 | 123.3 | -1.89 | +0.41 | 0.903 | 47.6% | +25 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.47 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1492 | 111.8 | +0.72 | +0.81 | 1.256 | 54.6% | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.27 | 2014 | 1583 | 116.3 | +1.31 | -1.07 | 0.896 | 48.0% | +19 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | -0.31 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1464 | 108.5 | -3.33 | -2.48 | 0.736 | 43.8% | +21 | +84 | — | 28.6% | -1.48 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 1469 | 99.7 | -3.90 | -0.31 | 0.624 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.29 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 1501 | 99.0 | -1.68 | +0.64 | 0.624 | 41.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 2017 | 1565 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1537 | 114.3 | -0.28 | -0.26 | 0.944 | 48.9% | — | — | +106 | 44.4% | -0.22 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 1569 | 107.0 | -0.03 | +0.98 | 0.801 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 27.3% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–0 | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 1552 | 115.6 | -2.98 | +0.30 | 0.739 | 43.9% | +14 | — | — | 16.7% | -1.92 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 1606 | 98.5 | -3.96 | -1.79 | 0.767 | 43.9% | +11 | — | — | 23.1% | -2.08 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 1562 | 97.0 | -4.02 | -4.60 | 0.591 | 39.9% | +43 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1546 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 1488 | 96.3 | -1.52 | -1.26 | 0.767 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1627 | 108.4 | -2.75 | -1.33 | 0.778 | 44.6% | +23 | +78 | +106 | 28.7% | -1.68 | 8–13 (38%) | 7–9 (44%) | 99.4 | +1.33 | — | 1702 | 124.3 | -0.93 | +0.43 | 0.957 | 49.0% | +14 | -72 | -7 | 49.0% | -0.22 | 18–19 (49%) | 18–8 (69%) | 106.5 | +1.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 5, 2022 | H2H |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 5, 2020 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 13, 2020 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 4, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 3, 2013 | H2H |
| Galina Voskoboeva | 3 | 0 | 3 | Oct 20, 2011 | H2H |
| Yung Jan Chan | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Lucie Hradecka | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 4, 2011 | H2H |