H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Vitalia Diatchenko vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-1
Vitalia Diatchenko and Stefanie Voegele are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vitalia Diatchenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Stefanie Voegele leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vitalia Diatchenko won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Vitalia Diatchenko | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2009* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Stefanie Voegele | 6-3 7-5 | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |