H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 0-1
Ashleigh Barty holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2017 Kuala Lumpur semifinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2017* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 7-5 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |