H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 1-0
Xinyun Han holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Xinyun Han leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyun Han won the 2010 Guangzhou fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |