H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-0
Xinyun Han holds a 1–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Xinyun Han leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyun Han won the 2010 Guangzhou third round 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2016 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 7-5 6-1 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2010* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |