H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Yingying Duan H2H: 0-1
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2016 Jiangxi Open fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2019 | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 6-1 2-6 7-5 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2016* | Jiangxi Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |