Xiyu Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Linda Noskova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Xiyu Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Jamie Loeb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Xiyu Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xiyu Wang won the 2022 Granby first round 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiyu Wang | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Aug 24, 2022* | R32 | Granby | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Xiyu Wang | 6-4 6-1 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Jul 30, 2022 | Q1 | Washington Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiyu Wang | #80 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,774 | 71 | 92 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jamie Loeb | #484 | #132 | 460 | 1,577 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #98 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #80 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2017 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 53 | 69 | 122 | 43.4% | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 155/163 of Xiyu Wang's and 13/13 of Jamie Loeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 64.3% | 61.3% | 42.5% | 41.7% | 27.8% | 54.5% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 64.2% | 50.9% | 47.7% | 28.6% | 42.1% | 49.8% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 61.9% | 58.3% | 47.8% | 41.7% | 27.6% | 54.3% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 9/9 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 61.8% | 71.7% | 45.1% | 56.8% | 43.6% | 61.6% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 9/9 | 5.3 | 7.7 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 46.8% | 54.2% | 43.3% | 60.1% | 35.7% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.9% | 44.8% | 42.9% | 50.0% | — | 43.9% | 23.7% |
| 21 | 2022 | 23/23 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 64.7% | 65.3% | 41.4% | 55.3% | 43.1% | 56.9% | 41.2% | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 53.4% | 45.4% | 41.7% | 14.3% | 49.9% | 26.1% |
| 22 | 2023 | 40/40 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 64.6% | 68.4% | 44.1% | 54.9% | 38.4% | 59.9% | 40.4% | 2017 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 50.4% | 62.8% | 41.8% | 28.7% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 42.1% |
| 23 | 2024 | 41/44 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 63.6% | 67.6% | 48.0% | 59.1% | 42.3% | 60.2% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 8/12 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 67.1% | 59.2% | 46.5% | 47.6% | 51.7% | 54.8% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 10/11 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 72.0% | 59.2% | 45.6% | 62.7% | 62.8% | 56.8% | 46.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 52.4% | 59.2% | 48.5% | 61.1% | 33.3% | 54.0% | 33.7% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 58.1% | 73.5% | 37.3% | 62.2% | 21.4% | 58.5% | 28.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 56.4% | 28.0% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 47.5% | 42.7% |
| Career | — | 155/163 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 64.4% | 65.8% | 45.5% | 54.7% | 42.3% | 58.5% | 41.1% | — | 13/14 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 60.3% | 42.2% | 46.9% | 31.1% | 52.3% | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1493 | 102.6 | -0.03 | -1.38 | 0.942 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.00 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1539 | 113.0 | -1.31 | -1.37 | 0.806 | 45.1% | +12 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1549 | 116.5 | -1.02 | -2.91 | 0.808 | 45.8% | +8 | — | — | 26.3% | -1.63 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 1642 | 128.8 | +2.08 | -0.04 | 1.144 | 52.7% | +21 | — | — | 61.9% | +1.14 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.4 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1590 | 113.7 | +1.46 | -3.26 | 0.895 | 48.3% | -1 | — | — | 34.8% | -1.13 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.6 | -0.61 | 2015 | 1497 | 102.9 | +2.82 | +1.02 | 0.422 | 35.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1702 | 127.2 | +0.16 | -0.43 | 0.957 | 49.1% | -3 | -89 | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–3 (70%) | 105.1 | -0.30 | 2016 | 1501 | 99.5 | -1.29 | -5.38 | 0.522 | 38.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1698 | 126.2 | +1.61 | -1.99 | 1.006 | 50.0% | -39 | -37 | -107 | 44.8% | -0.23 | 7–11 (39%) | 6–13 (32%) | 91.1 | +0.18 | 2017 | 1535 | 115.6 | -1.34 | -1.45 | 0.887 | 47.6% | +41 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1695 | 141.6 | +3.01 | -0.70 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -13 | +15 | — | 48.5% | +0.17 | 6–9 (40%) | 9–14 (39%) | 93.9 | -1.78 | 2018 | 1520 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 24 | 2025 | 1620 | 123.7 | -0.71 | -1.00 | 0.920 | 47.8% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.96 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | -0.15 | 2019 | 1472 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 1770 | 138.1 | +1.51 | +2.93 | 1.082 | 52.0% | -45 | +23 | — | 47.6% | +0.38 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.32 | 2020 | 1444 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1439 | 92.5 | +1.84 | +1.86 | 0.732 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1447 | 104.9 | -0.88 | +0.62 | 0.692 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1428 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1391 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1422 | 105.4 | -1.30 | -3.22 | 0.813 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1410 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1775 | 135.8 | +1.41 | -1.04 | 0.990 | 49.8% | -9 | -17 | -107 | 45.6% | -0.18 | 22–35 (39%) | 29–40 (42%) | 91.3 | -1.70 | — | 1578 | 106.4 | -0.20 | -0.92 | 0.719 | 44.1% | +41 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.66 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.9 | -2.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Linda Noskova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Lauren Davis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 24, 2022 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 1, 2021 | H2H |