H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xiyu Wang vs Jamie Loeb H2H: 1-0
Xiyu Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Jamie Loeb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Xiyu Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xiyu Wang won the 2022 Granby third round 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022* | Granby | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Xiyu Wang | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2 | Jamie Loeb | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2022 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Xiyu Wang | 6-4 6-1 | Jamie Loeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiyu Wang | #89 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,776 | 66 | 88 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jamie Loeb | #484 | #132 | 460 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #89 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |