H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-2
Rebecca Peterson holds a 2–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Peterson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2019 Tianjin quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2015* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |