H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 1–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Australian Open second round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-4 7-6(5) Yaroslava Shvedova #85 Match data Jan 17, 2008* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,469 0 1 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,666 0 1 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,647 0 1 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,604 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2% — — — — — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/318 of Yaroslava Shvedova's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 3/3 2.3 2.7 45.6% 64.2% 50.7% 16.7% 47.2% 57.7% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 17/24 2.6 3.4 57.6% 63.5% 44.3% 48.3% 51.3% 54.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 14/19 3.1 2.9 62.5% 60.4% 48.9% 50.9% 42.9% 56.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 33/35 3.5 3.2 60.1% 67.7% 49.4% 54.7% 45.7% 60.4% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 41/45 3.2 4.4 60.1% 62.0% 43.5% 48.1% 41.2% 54.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 18/19 2.8 3.7 60.4% 60.6% 49.6% 53.0% 52.7% 55.7% 42.9% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2012 26/30 3.2 4.6 60.9% 67.0% 49.4% 56.5% 49.7% 59.9% 47.3% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2013 20/25 1.8 5.8 63.5% 60.8% 42.5% 36.3% 50.2% 53.9% 43.7% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2014 30/31 3.7 4.7 67.1% 63.6% 42.8% 54.7% 52.0% 56.6% 43.7% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2015 22/27 3.9 4.1 70.8% 63.1% 53.3% 52.9% 46.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2016 29/34 3.4 4.0 60.8% 66.9% 44.5% 58.1% 49.7% 57.9% 42.5% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2017 14/14 2.3 2.6 63.8% 60.8% 53.3% 43.1% 46.9% 58.1% 37.1% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
32 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.5% 16.7% 46.9% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 9/11 2.4 4.4 61.6% 56.6% 34.9% 42.8% 59.3% 48.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/320 3.1 4.0 62.2% 63.5% 46.5% 50.6% 47.9% 56.9% 42.8% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2007 1492 109.2 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +11 +77 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 96.9 +1.01 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -8 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.13 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2009 1601 137.0 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -57 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.16 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2010 1667 129.4 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -71 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.53 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +72 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2012 1690 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -128 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +42 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +131 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2016 1708 136.4 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +6 -100 +67 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
32 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1497 103.5 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -11 +77 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +42 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.90 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.