H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yaroslava Shvedova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 1-2
Maria Kirilenko holds a 2–1 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2012 Moscow fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 7-5 6-4 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2010* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2009* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-4 6-1 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yaroslava Shvedova | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |