H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 1-0
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Yingying Duan | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |