H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 0-1
Petra Kvitova holds a 1–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2015 Shenzhen third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-3 6-1 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |