H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 0-1
Roberta Vinci holds a 1–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Roberta Vinci | 6-3 7-5 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |