H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Yulia Putintseva holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2023 Roland Garros first round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 7-5 7-6(3) | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yulia Putintseva | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |