H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-3
Ons Jabeur holds a 3–1 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2025 Adelaide fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-2 6-4 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| May 13, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 6-3 6-2 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-2 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |