H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Elise Burgin H2H: 0-2
Elise Burgin holds a 2–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1985 US Open first round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-0 6-1 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1985* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Vermaak | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |