H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Zarina Diyas vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 1-0
Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2010 Moscow third round 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2010* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |