H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1

Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2021 Nur-Sultan second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Peterson
Sweden Age 31 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Peterson #86 6-2 6-2 Zarina Diyas #109 Match data Sep 30, 2021* R16 Nur-Sultan WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rebecca Peterson #573 #43 1,332 1,861 80 95 45.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Rebecca Peterson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #263 1,484 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #230 1,489 0 0
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2015 3–4 42.9% #131 1,505 0 0
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0 2016 3–6 33.3% #146 1,505 0 0
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0 2017 2–3 40.0% #174 1,550 0 0
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0 2018 10–11 47.6% #63 1,693 0 0
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1 2019 25–18 58.1% #44 1,861 0 2
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1 2020 3–10 23.1% #55 1,697 0 2
25 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1 2021 18–18 50.0% #88 1,699 0 2
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1 2022 7–14 33.3% #119 1,659 0 2
27 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1 2023 8–7 53.3% #127 1,647 0 2
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zarina Diyas Rebecca Peterson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2019 17 9 26 65.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2023 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — 58 51 109 53.2% 18 34 52 34.6% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zarina Diyas Rebecca Peterson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1% 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 64.3% 41.7% 40.0% 45.5% 66.7% 41.1% 42.2%
18 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1% 2014 3/3 0.7 4.0 64.5% 51.3% 36.8% 49.5% 42.5% 46.3% 44.1%
19 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8% 2015 5/7 0.8 4.8 70.0% 57.3% 48.6% 36.8% 50.3% 55.0% 41.0%
20 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8% 2016 9/9 1.6 3.6 68.4% 61.4% 41.7% 48.7% 51.7% 55.4% 40.7%
21 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1% 2017 5/5 2.2 3.2 64.2% 63.6% 48.6% 73.1% 59.8% 58.0% 42.1%
22 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9% 2018 21/21 3.6 3.7 63.7% 62.9% 41.3% 57.6% 50.4% 55.0% 43.1%
23 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1% 2019 42/43 2.2 2.8 67.1% 61.9% 50.4% 57.2% 44.5% 58.0% 43.3%
24 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8% 2020 13/13 1.5 2.8 66.5% 55.9% 44.5% 36.8% 30.4% 51.8% 39.5%
25 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1% 2021 34/36 2.3 3.4 65.5% 62.2% 47.7% 52.4% 47.4% 57.1% 41.3%
26 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2% 2022 20/21 1.9 3.7 63.7% 61.1% 42.5% 45.1% 45.0% 54.0% 39.8%
27 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3% 2023 15/15 2.1 4.1 65.3% 64.3% 40.5% 53.5% 51.5% 55.9% 45.3%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4% — 168/175 2.2 3.4 65.7% 61.3% 45.5% 52.1% 46.5% 55.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zarina Diyas Rebecca Peterson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06 2012 1488 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16 2013 1485 102.5 +3.18 +1.91 0.716 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.28
18 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2014 1490 101.8 -1.67 +0.24 0.821 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
19 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31 2015 1505 104.6 -0.71 -1.19 0.911 47.7% — -1 — 37.5% -1.06 2–0 1–1 — -0.09
20 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75 2016 1506 107.2 -0.91 -1.94 0.911 48.2% +59 -42 — 42.1% -0.37 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
21 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00 2017 1550 106.4 +0.60 -1.14 1.003 50.3% +49 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
22 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38 2018 1693 125.9 -0.84 -0.13 0.960 49.2% +26 -250 -63 46.7% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.29
23 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69 2019 1862 140.3 +1.54 +0.91 1.032 50.8% -2 -323 -222 53.6% +0.22 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -2.59
24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35 2020 1698 103.7 -2.62 -2.51 0.819 45.3% +41 -190 — 20.8% -2.08 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.28
25 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02 2021 1700 129.0 +0.81 -0.92 0.963 49.2% +11 -79 — 49.4% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -0.71
26 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43 2022 1659 117.2 -1.27 -2.53 0.866 47.2% +49 -54 — 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
27 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46 2023 1647 126.0 -0.31 +1.31 1.028 50.7% +73 -62 — 48.5% +0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 97.8 -0.35
28 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23 2024 1645 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.69 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47 — 1862 129.7 0.00 -0.51 0.952 49.0% +25 -149 -151 44.3% -0.36 28–25 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 101.5 -2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.