H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-3

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2018 Indian Wells first round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
KAZ Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2018* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Serena Williams #22 7-5 6-3 Zarina Diyas #53 Match data
Mar 24, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 7-5 6-3 Zarina Diyas #97 Match data
Mar 12, 2015* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Zarina Diyas #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,751 99 127 43.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,527 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,503 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,476 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,683 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,576 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,558 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,667 0 1 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,718 0 1 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2019 7–14 33.3% #77 1,697 0 1 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,655 0 1 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2021 13–16 44.8% #102 1,688 0 1 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 — — — — — — — 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,632 0 1 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71