H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Johanna Konta H2H: 3-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–1 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2018 Sydney third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2018* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 7-5 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2017* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-4 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-2 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2016* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-0 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |