H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-1
Ajla Tomljanovic holds a 2–1 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2019 Zhengzhou quarterfinal 6-1 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2019* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2019* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2019* | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-1 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ajla Tomljanovic | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |