H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ajla Tomljanovic vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-2

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Tianjin first round 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ajla Tomljanovic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #30 7-6(4) 7-5 Ajla Tomljanovic #46 Match data Oct 11, 2018* R32 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ajla Tomljanovic #53 6-4 5-7 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #29 Match data Sep 22, 2018* SF Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Su-Wei Hsieh #40 4-6 6-2 6-0 Ajla Tomljanovic #60 Match data Sep 15, 2018* QF Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ajla Tomljanovic #103 #32 1,490 1,919 192 227 45.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 2009 0–1 0.0% #301 1,484 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
17 2010 1–3 25.0% #164 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–5 16.7% #149 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 0–1 0.0% #493 1,420 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2013 7–7 50.0% #73 1,523 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2014 17–20 45.9% #63 1,587 0 0 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2015 18–21 46.2% #65 1,604 0 0 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2016 0–2 0.0% #929 1,581 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2017 5–10 33.3% #136 1,571 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2018 22–19 53.7% #46 1,713 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2019 25–29 46.3% #51 1,653 0 0 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2020 5–11 31.2% #68 1,615 0 0 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2021 24–22 52.2% #45 1,778 0 0 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 2022 28–24 53.8% #33 1,867 0 0 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 2023 1–2 33.3% #290 1,847 0 0 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 2024 9–15 37.5% #109 1,791 0 0 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 2025 17–22 43.6% #80 1,768 0 0 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 2026 12–13 48.0% #103 1,715 0 0 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
16 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2014 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2022 14 15 29 48.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2024 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2025 11 14 25 44.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 2026 8 5 13 61.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 118 142 260 45.4% 45 57 102 44.1% 29 28 57 50.9% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 388/420 of Ajla Tomljanovic's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 1/1 1.0 7.0 58.7% 61.4% 35.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 4/4 2.5 4.3 56.4% 63.8% 45.0% 54.7% 49.3% 55.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6/6 3.0 4.7 56.9% 62.3% 39.8% 53.5% 54.9% 52.7% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1/1 0.0 8.0 54.2% 53.8% 27.3% 25.0% 44.4% 41.7% 42.6% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2013 11/14 4.5 4.5 56.5% 64.4% 45.5% 54.6% 49.4% 56.3% 44.4% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2014 32/37 4.2 4.3 56.7% 68.6% 43.3% 54.3% 46.9% 57.7% 41.4% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2015 33/39 4.1 4.3 62.9% 64.1% 48.0% 47.9% 47.0% 58.1% 39.9% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2016 2/2 2.0 5.0 54.1% 51.0% 30.3% 57.2% 70.8% 41.5% 43.0% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2017 15/15 2.1 5.7 58.1% 61.2% 36.9% 45.7% 39.5% 50.7% 41.8% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2018 41/41 3.4 4.9 58.4% 64.1% 43.8% 46.4% 51.9% 55.6% 44.1% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2019 53/54 3.5 4.3 57.9% 66.8% 41.5% 49.1% 46.9% 56.3% 44.0% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2020 16/16 3.3 4.3 55.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.0% 40.7% 56.3% 40.8% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2021 44/46 2.5 4.0 61.8% 64.4% 45.8% 55.9% 46.4% 57.2% 43.6% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 2022 52/52 2.6 4.2 62.5% 64.6% 43.8% 48.1% 52.0% 56.8% 44.1% 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 2023 2/3 3.0 5.0 65.3% 62.9% 47.1% 43.8% 48.0% 57.5% 43.1% 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 2024 22/24 2.9 7.5 64.1% 62.8% 38.0% 50.7% 40.5% 53.9% 42.4% 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 2025 28/39 2.2 5.6 65.8% 61.9% 42.1% 49.1% 51.2% 55.2% 43.4% 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 2026 25/26 1.9 5.7 67.2% 63.3% 44.0% 54.1% 53.1% 56.9% 45.4% 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 388/420 3.0 4.8 60.7% 64.4% 43.3% 50.2% 48.3% 56.1% 43.1% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 2009 1484 97.7 -3.11 -1.39 0.579 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
17 2010 1465 98.9 -2.42 -2.23 0.863 47.3% +22 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1436 104.6 -1.59 +0.58 1.019 50.4% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1421 96.4 -2.81 -3.22 0.731 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2013 1524 117.9 -0.54 -0.01 1.015 50.1% +16 — +14 50.0% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 3–0 (100%) — 0.00 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2014 1588 121.5 +0.93 -1.84 0.978 49.5% -16 +10 — 48.2% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 102.5 +0.94 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2015 1605 119.3 -0.59 -1.44 0.953 49.0% -12 +8 -87 45.1% -0.46 8–5 (62%) 12–3 (80%) 109.7 +0.57 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2016 1581 102.8 -1.21 +0.88 0.734 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2017 1571 112.5 -3.75 +0.50 0.848 46.2% +16 -10 — 42.4% -0.94 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.62 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 2018 1714 128.3 -0.28 +0.61 0.992 49.8% -20 -131 -150 51.0% +0.03 12–8 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 103.1 -0.62 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 2019 1654 138.3 -0.07 +1.07 1.005 50.1% +8 -20 -47 50.0% +0.06 6–12 (33%) 6–11 (35%) 94.0 -0.88 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40
27 2020 1615 130.7 +0.18 -1.12 0.935 48.5% +33 -43 — 36.8% -0.79 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.6 -0.53 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23
28 2021 1779 141.3 +0.91 +0.76 1.019 50.3% -67 -93 -32 52.0% +0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 103.3 -0.37 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26
29 2022 1867 144.0 +0.10 +1.33 1.021 50.4% -31 -149 -23 53.0% +0.16 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -1.02 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 2023 1848 99.8 -0.66 +1.44 1.016 50.2% -57 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.22 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11
31 2024 1792 122.8 -1.50 -0.80 0.920 48.1% -16 -35 +106 41.1% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.2 -0.89 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19
32 2025 1769 134.0 -0.96 +0.30 0.968 49.2% -15 -12 +78 46.2% -0.34 8–9 (47%) 9–1 (90%) 104.4 -0.95 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49
33 2026 1715 134.5 -0.15 +1.20 1.055 51.2% +100 -103 +130 50.0% +0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +0.07 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 136.5 -0.29 +0.21 0.982 49.6% -8 -55 -5 47.6% -0.20 75–88 (46%) 63–57 (53%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.