H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-2
Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Tianjin third round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2018* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2018* | Seoul | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |