H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Aleksandra Krunic vs Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik H2H: 1-0
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2017 Bol final 6-3 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2017* | Bol | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Aleksandra Krunic | 6-3 3-0 (ret.) | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | #1,168 | #59 | 972 | 1,601 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aleksandra Krunic | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #236 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #157 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |