H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Panova vs Conny Perrin H2H: 1-0
Alexandra Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Conny Perrin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandra Panova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandra Panova won the 2016 Bogota fourth round 7-6(7) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 35
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Alexandra Panova | 7-6(7) 7-6(7) | Conny Perrin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Panova | #1,014 | #71 | 890 | 1,546 | 32 | 52 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Conny Perrin | #681 | #134 | 442 | 1,584 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Panova | Conny Perrin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #208 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #153 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #88 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #135 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #133 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #208 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |