H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 14:15 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Martina Trevisan H2H: 0-1
Martina Trevisan holds a 1–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Trevisan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Trevisan won the 2022 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(10) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Martina Trevisan | 7-6(10) 7-5 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 170 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #143 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |