H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 14:15 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 0-1
Maryna Zanevska holds a 1–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maryna Zanevska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maryna Zanevska won the 2022 Hamburg quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Maryna Zanevska | 6-4 7-5 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 170 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #143 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |