H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-0
Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2015 Luxembourg fourth round 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |