H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 1-1
Alison Van Uytvanck and Dominika Cibulkova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on grass, while Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2018 Budapest final 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2018* | Budapest | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Dominika Cibulkova | 3-6 6-3 8-6 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |