H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Van Uytvanck vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 1-2

Petra Kvitova holds a 2–1 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2023 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
Czech Republic Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Kvitova #15 7-6(3) 6-2 Alison Van Uytvanck #68 Match data Jan 18, 2023* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Alison Van Uytvanck #59 5-7 6-3 6-0 Petra Kvitova #13 Match data Jul 28, 2021* R32 Tokyo Olympics Olympics Hard
Petra Kvitova #11 7-6(1) 1-6 6-2 Alison Van Uytvanck #47 Match data Feb 14, 2020* R16 St. Petersburg Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,074 515 262 66.3% 2 9 2 14 4 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,702 0 1
20 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,701 0 1
21 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,059 1 7
22 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0 2012 41–16 71.9% #8 1,960 1 9
23 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,962 1 11
24 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,982 2 14
25 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,908 2 17
26 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4 2016 46–20 69.7% #11 1,990 2 19
27 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,902 2 20
28 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5 2018 43–18 70.5% #7 1,896 2 25
29 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5 2019 37–16 69.8% #7 1,914 2 27
30 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,964 2 27
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–18 61.7% #17 1,888 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,913 2 29
33 — — — — — — — 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,923 2 31
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,767 2 31

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Petra Kvitova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
21 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 25 9 34 73.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
22 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2012 24 9 33 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
23 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 33 14 47 70.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2014 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
25 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 22 12 34 64.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 36 13 49 73.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
28 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 26 13 39 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2020 15 6 21 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 11 29 62.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 20 13 33 60.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 21 10 31 67.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0% — — — — — 333 178 511 65.2% 100 54 154 64.9% 75 27 102 73.5% 7 3 10 70.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's and 700/776 of Petra Kvitova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Petra Kvitova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7% 2008 24/27 3.0 5.3 63.7% 63.6% 47.7% 46.7% 53.6% 57.6% 45.7%
19 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2% 2009 30/34 1.8 5.1 59.8% 60.5% 45.4% 55.0% 48.3% 54.5% 47.3%
20 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9% 2010 35/37 2.8 4.7 62.7% 64.0% 44.8% 52.6% 50.6% 56.9% 42.7%
21 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7% 2011 56/61 3.8 3.5 61.7% 69.6% 52.2% 58.0% 49.5% 62.8% 45.6%
22 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5% 2012 51/57 3.5 3.5 63.9% 69.6% 51.7% 55.0% 48.8% 63.1% 47.0%
23 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1% 2013 68/71 3.6 5.2 62.7% 64.2% 47.5% 58.9% 51.8% 57.9% 44.3%
24 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5% 2014 52/58 4.9 4.1 62.0% 71.2% 51.8% 54.1% 46.7% 63.8% 45.2%
25 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5% 2015 38/51 4.2 3.6 63.4% 73.6% 54.7% 56.3% 49.5% 66.5% 42.6%
26 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1% 2016 57/66 3.8 4.2 61.7% 70.6% 50.9% 56.2% 49.0% 62.8% 45.5%
27 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7% 2017 28/28 5.6 5.9 58.0% 74.6% 47.5% 51.2% 46.1% 63.3% 43.9%
28 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2018 55/61 4.4 5.7 59.9% 70.0% 49.7% 60.8% 50.3% 61.8% 45.9%
29 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6% 2019 45/53 4.9 4.2 61.9% 71.7% 52.0% 60.5% 44.4% 64.4% 44.3%
30 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5% 2020 26/27 4.8 4.2 63.5% 69.7% 53.3% 54.9% 46.8% 63.5% 46.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/47 4.5 3.9 64.0% 68.8% 49.7% 62.5% 46.2% 61.9% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 46/47 5.1 4.9 63.0% 68.6% 47.4% 61.8% 52.7% 60.6% 41.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 40/42 5.3 5.5 62.7% 70.6% 47.6% 53.6% 50.3% 61.8% 43.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 7/9 3.1 6.0 63.8% 55.9% 35.9% 46.9% 56.2% 48.7% 36.5%
Career — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8% — 700/777 4.1 4.6 62.2% 68.8% 49.6% 56.7% 49.2% 61.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Petra Kvitova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15 2007 1485 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05
18 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05 2008 1608 130.9 +1.66 +1.28 1.077 51.5% -18 +7 — 50.0% +0.12 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -0.04
19 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29 2009 1703 133.5 -0.27 +2.91 1.039 50.9% +7 -102 — 48.6% +0.10 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.83
20 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20 2010 1702 137.8 +1.40 +0.05 0.989 49.8% -21 -143 -22 45.0% -0.47 4–5 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 100.1 -2.15
21 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57 2011 2060 158.0 +7.08 +2.42 1.227 54.1% -93 -295 -101 74.3% +1.54 13–5 (72%) 13–7 (65%) 109.8 -3.06
22 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27 2012 1960 153.8 +6.34 +3.52 1.273 54.6% +3 -103 -2 66.4% +1.26 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +1.48
23 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26 2013 1963 151.5 +2.63 +1.47 1.052 51.1% +38 -108 +7 61.3% +0.64 23–12 (66%) 9–7 (56%) 102.8 +2.65
24 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03 2014 1982 155.2 +6.82 +2.91 1.250 54.4% -16 -166 +99 66.9% +1.31 10–7 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 103.3 +2.20
25 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05 2015 1908 152.2 +7.08 +1.73 1.269 54.3% -11 -15 +115 64.4% +1.07 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 95.4 +0.55
26 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13 2016 1990 155.9 +6.43 +2.58 1.224 54.2% +26 -112 -49 67.1% +1.38 11–9 (55%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 -0.37
27 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37 2017 1903 140.4 +4.94 +1.34 1.195 53.1% +28 — +99 63.9% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 92.8 -0.22
28 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23 2018 1896 151.5 +4.70 +3.13 1.203 53.8% -27 +81 +127 64.7% +1.07 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.40
29 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67 2019 1914 163.0 +6.74 +2.67 1.245 54.0% -18 +139 +129 68.6% +1.29 8–9 (47%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 -0.06
30 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23 2020 1965 151.9 +5.00 +3.29 1.269 54.5% -21 +92 — 70.5% +1.49 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.7 +0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1889 149.5 +4.60 +1.74 1.160 53.1% +19 +158 +227 63.1% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 94.2 +1.06
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1913 149.9 +3.47 -0.04 1.055 51.1% +11 +3 +252 57.3% +0.48 10–5 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 104.8 -0.28
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1924 152.8 +4.16 +0.64 1.127 52.2% +25 — +314 64.4% +0.86 6–4 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 101.6 +0.31
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1768 106.1 -3.70 -3.58 0.711 43.0% +76 +18 — 27.3% -1.50 0–4 (0%) — — +0.07
Career — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02 — 2074 157.9 +4.70 +1.98 1.158 52.9% -3 -35 +84 62.9% +0.91 148–108 (58%) 112–84 (57%) 101.7 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.