H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 2–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2018 Libéma Open first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-1 6-2 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Jun 14, 2018* | R32 | Libéma Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-2 7-6(4) | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Oct 22, 2015* | R32 | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,772 | 123 | 149 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,581 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,685 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,609 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 85 | 90 | 175 | 48.6% | 22 | 34 | 56 | 39.3% | 16 | 25 | 41 | 39.0% | — | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 61.8% | 66.5% | 34.7% | 49.3% | 52.4% | 54.4% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 59.4% | 63.4% | 49.6% | 61.1% | 31.4% | 57.9% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 56.2% | 32.9% | 46.0% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 27/27 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 63.0% | 51.0% | 51.3% | 46.0% | 58.1% | 40.9% | 2012 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 48.8% | 65.9% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 57.0% | 36.8% |
| 21 | 2015 | 23/37 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 58.9% | 64.4% | 48.6% | 53.1% | 49.1% | 57.9% | 36.7% | 2013 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 57.2% | 55.4% | 46.8% | 57.9% | 78.0% | 52.0% | 45.5% |
| 22 | 2016 | 17/17 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 67.4% | 44.6% | 54.9% | 47.7% | 57.8% | 38.5% | 2014 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 64.9% | 56.6% | 37.3% | 55.0% | 65.3% | 50.3% | 48.5% |
| 23 | 2017 | 14/17 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 55.4% | 69.1% | 53.4% | 64.4% | 41.5% | 62.4% | 41.1% | 2015 | 8/9 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 59.2% | 60.5% | 48.0% | 55.2% | 51.4% | 55.8% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2018 | 39/41 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 62.4% | 65.5% | 48.1% | 61.6% | 44.8% | 59.2% | 42.5% | 2016 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 55.6% | 63.8% | 49.0% | 61.8% | 57.0% | 57.1% | 45.2% |
| 25 | 2019 | 42/42 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 64.8% | 63.0% | 47.3% | 55.8% | 46.2% | 57.4% | 44.5% | 2017 | 13/13 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 59.1% | 62.5% | 49.4% | 47.9% | 42.7% | 57.2% | 39.2% |
| 26 | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 62.3% | 66.6% | 46.1% | 47.0% | 40.8% | 58.7% | 41.1% | 2018 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 55.4% | 55.2% | 40.6% | 47.6% | 31.3% | 48.4% | 34.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 27/30 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 63.1% | 45.0% | 54.3% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 44.7% | 2019 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 61.5% | 54.2% | 43.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
| 28 | 2022 | 22/22 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 58.2% | 64.6% | 48.0% | 60.7% | 42.8% | 57.8% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 7/7 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 60.8% | 65.7% | 40.3% | 59.0% | 60.3% | 55.8% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 61.9% | 50.4% | 34.4% | 43.3% | 51.0% | 44.3% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 250/272 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 60.8% | 64.4% | 47.1% | 55.7% | 46.4% | 57.7% | 41.8% | — | 40/42 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 57.8% | 60.5% | 47.0% | 53.0% | 49.0% | 54.9% | 39.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alison Van Uytvanck | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1511 | 108.0 | -2.51 | -2.37 | 0.928 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.43 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1555 | 103.7 | +2.11 | -1.71 | 0.894 | 47.9% | — | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1524 | 90.5 | -1.68 | -1.92 | 0.831 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1526 | 113.6 | +1.00 | -2.70 | 0.975 | 49.4% | -8 | +12 | +42 | 43.3% | -0.03 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–6 (14%) | 92.5 | +0.20 | 2012 | 1513 | 105.3 | +0.72 | -1.37 | 0.857 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1647 | 123.7 | +0.26 | -3.01 | 0.870 | 47.5% | -6 | -88 | -87 | 50.6% | -0.10 | 7–4 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.57 | 2013 | 1525 | 101.1 | -1.26 | -0.60 | 0.947 | 49.5% | — | +62 | — | 44.4% | -0.45 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1517 | 106.5 | +0.03 | -3.82 | 0.912 | 48.2% | +32 | — | -45 | 36.6% | -0.90 | 0–7 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | 92.1 | +0.27 | 2014 | 1530 | 104.8 | -1.97 | -1.72 | 0.975 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1634 | 121.0 | +2.65 | -1.27 | 1.095 | 51.6% | +11 | -34 | — | 55.3% | +0.42 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | +0.26 | 2015 | 1496 | 108.3 | -1.68 | -2.17 | 0.778 | 45.4% | -26 | +70 | — | 26.3% | -1.68 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.22 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1661 | 129.7 | +1.86 | -0.17 | 1.042 | 50.6% | -23 | -93 | -60 | 46.9% | +0.15 | 8–8 (50%) | 4–10 (29%) | 97.5 | -1.03 | 2016 | 1549 | 112.0 | -0.08 | +0.20 | 1.052 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1736 | 130.4 | +0.69 | +0.82 | 1.044 | 50.9% | -1 | -93 | -105 | 55.9% | +0.33 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–1 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.05 | 2017 | 1538 | 106.6 | +0.40 | -2.44 | 0.917 | 48.4% | -45 | — | +57 | 39.3% | -0.64 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.12 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1674 | 126.9 | +0.77 | -1.27 | 0.995 | 49.6% | +24 | -57 | — | 46.3% | -0.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.2 | +0.13 | 2018 | 1514 | 95.9 | -2.74 | -3.00 | 0.659 | 41.5% | — | +56 | — | 9.1% | -3.36 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1772 | 134.7 | -0.09 | +1.01 | 1.015 | 50.6% | +34 | -271 | -124 | 51.5% | +0.36 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.37 | 2019 | 1479 | 104.6 | +0.93 | +3.09 | 0.867 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1685 | 128.7 | +0.29 | +0.04 | 1.018 | 50.4% | -5 | — | +57 | 50.0% | +0.19 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–6 (25%) | 86.9 | +0.23 | 2020 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 1687 | 120.1 | -1.26 | +0.60 | 0.919 | 48.7% | -9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.39 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.6 | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 1609 | 96.6 | -3.25 | -1.92 | 0.727 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 | 2022 | 1468 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1772 | 129.8 | +0.64 | -0.86 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +4 | -70 | -50 | 48.1% | -0.02 | 39–53 (42%) | 28–44 (39%) | 92.0 | +0.02 | — | 1581 | 108.2 | -0.69 | -1.69 | 0.874 | 47.4% | -39 | +63 | +57 | 35.9% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–8 (0%) | 92.3 | -1.95 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 29, 2021 | H2H |
| Polona Hercog | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 25, 2020 | H2H |
| Kirsten Flipkens | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Lara Arruabarrena | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Madison Brengle | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |