H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Van Uytvanck vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-0

Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2014 Luxembourg round of 32 5-7 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Stefanie Voegele
Switzerland Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Van Uytvanck #79 5-7 6-2 6-2 Stefanie Voegele #69 Match data Oct 16, 2014* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,700 100 173 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Stefanie Voegele
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0
20 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0
21 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,518 0 0
22 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,498 0 0
23 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,664 0 0
24 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,544 0 0
25 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,510 0 0
26 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4 2016 10–14 41.7% #114 1,517 0 0
27 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0
28 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,594 0 0
29 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5 2019 6–15 28.6% #119 1,594 0 0
30 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,602 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,537 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Stefanie Voegele
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 13 13 26 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 10 14 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0% — — — — — 66 106 172 38.4% 29 48 77 37.7% 4 17 21 19.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's and 262/273 of Stefanie Voegele's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Stefanie Voegele
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7% 2008 2/2 1.5 5.0 60.0% 55.1% 33.6% 16.3% 35.9% 46.4% 44.3%
19 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2% 2009 19/19 2.7 3.2 55.6% 66.8% 41.1% 47.3% 48.0% 55.2% 43.4%
20 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9% 2010 30/31 2.8 2.4 56.1% 60.6% 44.0% 42.9% 45.1% 53.4% 42.3%
21 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7% 2011 2/2 3.5 2.5 58.4% 56.9% 43.4% 50.0% 34.7% 51.7% 40.6%
22 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5% 2012 8/9 2.5 4.1 53.6% 59.9% 42.3% 48.9% 33.7% 51.9% 41.9%
23 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1% 2013 40/41 3.5 2.7 54.9% 66.3% 46.8% 48.5% 40.8% 57.6% 41.9%
24 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5% 2014 36/37 4.4 1.9 56.4% 64.9% 42.8% 47.4% 49.5% 55.2% 42.3%
25 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5% 2015 17/24 3.1 2.3 60.4% 60.0% 45.8% 54.8% 47.5% 54.2% 37.1%
26 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1% 2016 24/24 2.6 1.8 56.8% 61.1% 42.5% 48.6% 43.8% 53.2% 42.7%
27 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7% 2017 9/9 3.9 3.0 55.5% 63.6% 42.5% 53.3% 44.0% 54.3% 42.0%
28 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2018 26/26 3.3 1.9 56.8% 64.0% 47.0% 49.9% 36.3% 56.4% 38.5%
29 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6% 2019 21/21 2.2 2.8 56.8% 62.3% 40.6% 44.6% 46.9% 53.0% 41.5%
30 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5% 2020 6/6 2.0 3.0 53.4% 63.9% 39.8% 43.6% 31.9% 52.8% 40.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 2.4 2.8 56.4% 59.0% 42.2% 53.8% 40.4% 51.7% 40.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 6/6 0.8 3.7 51.6% 51.5% 31.0% 44.0% 48.0% 42.1% 40.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Stefanie Voegele
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05 2008 1486 102.6 +0.81 +2.45 0.828 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — -0.30
19 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29 2009 1559 110.5 -1.00 -0.45 0.970 48.9% -15 — +110 44.4% -0.20 7–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 107.0 +1.19
20 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20 2010 1504 114.4 -2.38 -0.92 0.908 47.8% +41 -52 — 37.7% -0.88 1–8 (11%) 4–5 (44%) 92.7 +0.26
21 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57 2011 1518 101.1 -0.37 -0.64 0.842 46.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.21
22 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27 2012 1498 112.2 -1.83 -0.15 0.870 46.8% -12 +15 — 31.8% -1.23 1–3 (25%) — — -0.33
23 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26 2013 1665 132.8 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.8% -31 -48 -123 46.9% -0.05 14–4 (78%) 5–8 (38%) 112.4 -0.72
24 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03 2014 1544 116.4 -1.15 -1.36 0.944 48.6% +18 +54 — 43.7% -0.69 3–12 (20%) 6–6 (50%) 91.8 +0.91
25 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05 2015 1511 109.4 -3.15 -3.22 0.811 46.1% +55 +2 — 30.2% -1.26 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.11
26 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13 2016 1517 103.6 -2.18 -1.45 0.912 48.0% +27 +22 -70 42.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +1.52
27 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37 2017 1651 123.2 -0.54 +0.06 0.918 48.3% +32 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 1–0 — +0.12
28 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23 2018 1594 119.0 +0.12 -3.10 0.884 47.4% +36 -67 -143 39.3% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 -1.04
29 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67 2019 1594 116.8 -2.79 -1.89 0.882 47.2% +41 -76 — 34.8% -1.02 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 -0.08
30 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23 2020 1602 112.7 -0.73 -1.09 0.854 46.6% +29 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 1–1 — +0.01
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1538 111.9 -2.04 -1.43 0.834 46.0% +15 -4 — 28.9% -1.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1498 106.8 -4.32 -2.01 0.701 41.9% +78 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 — — +0.47
Career — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02 — 1700 120.1 -1.29 -1.46 0.904 47.8% +20 -14 -33 39.1% -0.79 41–51 (45%) 24–37 (39%) 96.3 +0.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.